~ An Ode to My Grandfather ~

Screen Shot 2018-04-06 at 10.16.31 AMSo, here is a small poem I wrote to celebrate the light that was my grandfather:
Hold a candle to the night
Its light will soar in the sky
Its light will illuminate the stars
Its light will make the moon dance with glee
Its light will guide men stranded at sea
A single candle against the night
Let it shine brightly for the whole world to see

Fondly remembered, dearly missed and loved – always and forever!


OPINION: I saw Padmaavat and YOU SHOULD TOO!



Poster by Sanjay Leela Bhansali Production House

Leaving my undying fondness, admiration, and respect for the GENIUS that is Ranveer Singh aside, Padmaavat is a cinematic marvel! Sanjay Leela Bhansali has mastered the ability to create HISTORICAL FICTION films like Bajirao Mastani (2015) and now Padmaavat with grandeur and finesse. For those who are unaware of the story: Padmaavat is an epic period drama about the 13th century Rajput Queen of Mewar (currently in south-central Rajasthan, India), Padmavati. The story – as shown in this film – revolves around the Turko-Afghan ruler of the Delhi Sultanate, Alauddin Khilji, who orchestrated the siege of Chittor Fort in Mewar in order to capture the Kingdom’s beautiful Queen. His desire was also motivated by an exiled Brahmin (originally from Mewar), who informed Khilji that his wealth and success would multiply by many-folds should he go after the Queen. Padmavati, whose not only beauty, but also astute wit and valour was unparalleled, leaves Alauddin’s desire to conqueror her a fantasy.

Over the last few months, people have taken to the streets to spawn protests – many of which have turned rabid and violent – against the content of this film without even seeing it. The debacle was brought to the forefront by the domestic and international media that highlighted the assault of creator, Sanjay Leela Bhansali, the destruction of the sets by mobs to the Karni Sena, a political party in the state of Rajasthan, inciting violence by threatening to harm the actors of the film – Deepika Padukone – last seen as Serena in Vin Diesel’s XXX: The Return of Xander Cage – who plays Queen Padmavati and Ranveer Singh, who adorns the role of Sultan Alauddin, for distorting history, playing with public sentiments and besmirching the honour and valour of the beloved Queen and Rajput community by suggesting a romance between her and Khilji, who was infatuated with her beauty, which  – mind you – was NOT the case here.

The announcement of the film also raised many questions: Was Padmavati (known as Queen Padmini in history) real or a figment of the original writer, Malik Muhammad Jayasi’s imagination? If she was not real, were the sentiments of the Indian public really hurt and by extension were the protests warranted? I cannot say, but as an ardent advocate of the Arts, I will say this: The Arts, whether it is through storytelling, theatre, art, dance, and music or mainstream cinema plays a pivotal role in our society – not only in India, but worldwide. In actuality, the Arts is that one medium that can puncture holes in walls of ignorance; it can foster empathy and understanding for the “other” by building bridges into worlds and cultures unknown or unheard of. In Aligarh (2015), I vicariously experienced the plight of members of the LGBTQ+ community in India. It got me thinking what section 377, which criminalizes sexual activities “against the order of nature”, would mean for them. In Margarita with a Straw (2014), Kalki Koechlin’s character Laila, an aspiring writer, who happens to be a teenager with cerebral palsy taught me that the way the world is oriented and the mentality of the people that live in it can make a differently-abled person feel “disabled”.

The Arts is also vexing, as it is liberating. Films like Padman (2018) and Toilet: Ek Prem Katha (2017) can be used as efficient tools to educate individuals from all walks of life about pressing social issues like the taboo on menstruation, lack of access to sanitary pads and easy access to lavatories for women, which are universal issues and not just specific to India alone. On the other hand, would this mean that every film should be regarded by the audience as a social manifesto? In my humble opinion, no. Coming back to Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s Padmaavat – those who have seen the film would have hopefully noticed the disclaimer shown at the beginning of the film. One of the elements the disclaimer cites, in words big and bold, is that this film does NOT claim to be an accurate depiction of historical events. Had the makers claimed it to be and the final product failed to do so, we would be having a different conversation. The Arts also provide an escape from life’s daily grind through entertainment and, in my opinion, Padmaavat does just that – entertain. The acting by the cast – everyone from Deepika, Shahid, Ranveer, Jim, Anupriya, Aditi to the very last extra on set – was impeccable! I, as do many, thought Ranveer with his portrayal of Khilji stole the show. The cinematography and sets were picturesque and stellar – as is often the case with Sanjay’s movies in this genre. The dance and music numbers were delightful.

But here is the reality: After having watched the film (which is an imperative if you wish to pass an opinion or judgment), if you felt differently to what I mentioned earlier – that is okay. The Arts is a subjective medium. Reputable film critics like Anupama Chopra and Sucharita Tyagi – both a part of Film Companion Reviews – may not necessarily like the same films or novels or cuisines, for example. Anupama may be crazy behind Indian street food, while Sucharita may have an affinity for Italian and that, folks, is okay also. What you take from the film may not be what your friend or family member sitting beside you gathers from the visual because, generally, individuals are influenced differently by their shared beliefs, values, and personal experiences. What is NOT okay is inciting violence against and/or violating individuals who are just doing their jobs! What is NOT okay is passing unsubstantiated claims without watching the film!

We live in a simple, yet complex era – iPads, Samsung phones, Youtube, Social Media, SIRI at complete disposal! At the click of a button, we can connect with someone that lives over 10,000 miles away, but we may not know how our neighbour is really doing. We have access to news or rather, news has access to us 24/7, which was not the case 2 decades ago. For this reason, our minds are active around the clock, constantly under siege by information of all sorts. We are consumers. We consume media every chance we get. This can be a bit unsettling! We are passionate beings, yes! The majority of us may pride ourselves on being opinionated. We may even pride ourselves on being patriotic. Our sentiments and opinions, heavily armed by our beliefs and values, may influence our decisions, but it is important to realize that our actions (as do our words) come with a set of consequences that not only affect us at an individual level, but also a local, national and global level. Hence, we, as consumers, need to learn to consume media responsibly. We need to have difficult conversations that will explore what that even means in today’s day and age. We need to avoid being passive participants and actively filter information whether it comes from news apps, political speeches, school textbooks, mainstream blockbuster movies or even from conversations with our near and dear ones and use it wisely. The rules of this game are still vague, but I know that the vast majority of us are doing the best we can with what we know, but we, as a people, need to continue to do better.

I believe a film like Padmaavat deserves great reception from domestic and international audiences. The fiasco that happened before, during and after the release of the movie could have been (and can still be) avoided. To excessively censure films and art, in general, is akin to placing a muzzle on freedom of speech and expression. This has been happening too frequently adding films like Udta Punjab (2016) and Lipstick Under My Burka (2017) to a gradually increasing list of names. If you do not want to watch the film, you have the right not to, but to censure content to change the product or to release unsubstantiated claims may be deja vu of George Orwell’s classic 1984.



Picture from: curseofthecreative.files.wordpress.com

There once was a girl. There was a moment in her life when her voice went unheard. She felt bound by the pressures and prejudices of society. It tried to hold her by her feet and glue her lips. Its myriad howling voices – those that told her to dress one way and behave another – attempted to mask her own. Bewildered and weary, she stopped dead in her tracks and sought to retreat. But, she did not for she knew her message, her voice was far greater than she had consciously known.

Vogue Empower My Choice: What the criticism actually did to feminism

This Is My Truth

The Vogue Empower video titled ‘My Choice’ featuring Deepika Padukone and 99 other women, from different walks of life, has already taken way too much space than it deserved. And yet, I feel the need to defend it. Allow me to explain why.

My first reaction:

The video was released on Saturday and when I first saw someone sharing it, I didn’t even bother to open it, just like I don’t care to open so many other virals the public seem to love. But then as more people started sharing it, particularly my feminist progressive friends, I thought ok lets see what it is all about. So I saw and thought it was just about nice, makes a few bold statements which can be appreciated except that they didn’t really have a large size woman, even when the narrative went, “To be a size zero or a size 15, my choice.”

My second…

View original post 1,389 more words

BBC releases India’s Daughter on YouTube!

I have a few things to say about this…
1) With regards to the absurd things M. L. Sharma and A. P. Singh (the defense lawyers for the rapists) have said in this documentary just goes to show that anyone can become a lawyer in India these days. Even if an FIR was not launched, why didn’t the bar take swift action and take away their licenses? Not everyone in India agrees with their views and opinions, unfortunately there is a sector of society that does uphold such thinking.
2) The day men (like the ones mentioned above) change their mentality and learn to respect women is the day change will ensue within society. Lets face it, true progress will not come if you try to deliberately exclude or eliminate one half of the society.
3) By banning ‪#‎IndiasDaughter documentary in India, the Indian Government cannot prevent the public (national and international) from addressing the elephant(s) in the room. In fact, such a documentary should spark debate amongst the public and parliament as to what long term solutions should be constructed and implemented to further educate the masses and eradicate India’s so called “Rape Culture.” Additionally, for the Indian Government to be constantly banning media content in an attempt to prevent India from being “defamed” is completely contradictory to the democratic values the country’s constitution upholds.

And lastly..

4) Unfortunately, what got to the perpetrators was a poverty of ambition [as shown in the documentary]. The government and the people need to understand that poverty and inequality of opportunity, especially to receive quality education, should be addressed within our communities worldwide because that is the root of all evil. With a decrease in poverty levels and increase in citizens receiving quality education, woman’s security (amongst other things) are bound to improve. The issue being addressed at hand is in fact a global issue and not just India’s issue.


After much speculation, the highly controversial documentary, India’s Daughter, makes its way to the World Wide Web. Banned in India, the documentary focuses on the rape case of Jyoti Singh who was brutally beaten and raped in Delhi in 2012.

The documentary highlights the aftermath of the event as well as a one on one interview with assailant Mukesh Singh. While BBC was in high hopes of releasing the video on television for Women’s Day (March 8th), heavy protests against Mukesh Singh’s lack of remorse and despicable comments lead the the ban of the documentary in India.

Directed by Leslee Udwin, the film has now been made available on YouTube.

View original post


“They dragged her to the road by her hair, tried to rip off her clothes and smiled at the cameras that filmed it all.” “He threw acid on her, aiming at her vagina and abdomen.” “Man who put ‘chastity lock on wife gets 10 years in jail.” “A 23-year-old female physiotherapy intern was beaten and gang-raped in a moving bus while travelling with her male friend.” The headlines are endless. News covering issues of sexual and physical abuse towards women in India have been highlighted on almost every national and international platform striking compelling debate. The Nirbhaya Rape Case that took place in the country’s capital was one of those many disasters that unleashed the storm. The public’s rage towards the whole ordeal was seen in the form of several protests with banners mentioning, ‘don’t tell me how to dress, tell them NOT to rape,’ the law was questioned and law enforcement, as well as the Members of Parliament, were interrogated with stringent leeway. With its steep rise in crimes against women, India has made it to the top of the charts as the “worst place to be a woman.”

The Indian society is known for its extensive diversity and strong cultural values. However, embedded in these traditions and values are key ideas that explicitly diminish the strength and purpose of a woman – Indian women in particular – thus significantly reshaping the idea of feminism in an Indian society. The ‘Mahabharat,’ a great Sanskrit epic, identifies a female character by the name of Draupadi. Although Draupadi played an integral part in the grand scheme of things, in a nutshell, she was born unasked by her father. As a result, she was stripped off any kind of joy and deprived of honour and respect as a wife and mother. Due to certain circumstances, Draupadi was coerced into marrying five men, all of whom were brothers. One of her five husbands lost her in a bet along with many of his other fortunes. She was also ridiculed in front of a room full of courtiers and almost ruthlessly disrobed. I say ‘almost’ because she was ultimately saved by divine intervention. Much of her misfortunes were blatantly blamed on her own ‘unparalleled’ beauty and intelligence. Within much of the epic, Draupadi was portrayed as a victim of circumstance who had absolutely no control over the situation. In the ‘Ramayan’, another great Sanskrit epic, Sita similar to Draupadi, was objectified and handed over as a prize won in a contest (known as Swayamvar); she was abducted and struggled to maintain her chastity during her detainment. Apart from these instances, Indian Mythology placed women on a pedestal that was deemed much superior to men. (Note the irony) However, interestingly enough mythologies such as the Mahabharat and Ramayan have exhibited that masculine power is derived from that of women. Both epics, eventually, deduced the idea that kings and their provinces were completely wiped out because they wronged a woman.

Furthermore, according to Hindu custom female Goddesses are worshiped with grandiosity yet all the institutions within the society not only fail to protect women, but also blame them for these happenings. The editor of an Assamese Women’s Magazine ‘Nandini’, Maini Mahanta claims that tradition, for the most part, still moulds women into “helpless victims” rather than “free-thinking individuals who are in control of their own destiny,” much like a modern day ‘Draupadi’. She goes on to state that events like Raksha Bandhan – the festival where a girl ties a safety thread around her brother’s wrist – signifies a brother’s duty to protect his sister and ancient scriptures such as the ‘Manu Sanghita’ form boundaries dictated by patriarchs that under no cost are to be surpassed by women. Therefore, from the time of birth women are burdened with the obligation to conform to a traditional way of behaving and a conservative way of donning themselves. Kavita Krishnan, a prominent women’s activist and Secretary of the All India Progressive Women’s Association (AIPWA), affirms, “there is clearly some anxiety all over the world among policy makers about how to re-persuade women to be “real” women – to go back to their traditional docile roles even as they become more empowered.”

Women here have found themselves in the midst of a hostile divide between traditional and modern ways of thinking. Mamta Sharma, chairwomen of the National Commission of Women (NCW) a statutory body formed by the provisions of the Indian Constitution that works towards promoting and protecting the interests of women within the Indian society, aroused a great deal of controversy when she released a statement to The Indian Express mentioning, “After 64 years of freedom, it is not right to give blanket directions… and say don’t wear this or don’t wear that. Be comfortable, but at the same time, be careful about how you dress… aping the west blindly is eroding our culture and causing such crimes to happen.” Sharma’s flagrant remark instigated a response from Sagarika Ghose, an Indian journalist and News Anchor, “It is not about blindly aping the west, Ms Sharma. It’s also about the vacuum in the law, lack of security at leisure spots, lack of gender justice, lack of fear of law, police and judicial apathy and the complete lack of awareness that men and women have the right to enjoy exactly the same kind of leisure activities.” There is no doubt that the nature of the crimes that occur within a public arena is in fact utterly horrendous, however, the most pervasive forms of sexual assault are often done by close kin in private spaces. Sanjay Srivastava, a professor in Sociology, claims, “our public places are unsafe, but they are not really as unsafe as our private ones. The latter is unsafe because of an almost watertight contract written in the language of trust, honour and tradition. It is a contract between different members of the family the powerful and the powerless to maintain the sanctity of the ‘Indian family’ and traditions at all costs.” He goes on to mention, “Historians and sociologists describe it as a unique aspect of Indian life, politicians sing its praises, movies and TV soaps extol its virtues, and Indians reprimand westerners with figures about the low divorce rate and the rock solid nature of the Indian family as compared to the western one.” So why is it that a society that prides itself on strong values and family ties continue to tolerate and at times even actively participate in crimes against women at home and in the wider society?

The horrific and outright shocking event of 16th December became a catalyst for legal change. The public alongside the media pressured the Indian government into making certain amendments within the law that would enforce the security of women in society. Under the refined version of the law tougher penalties were set for non-sexual, but gender-related acid attacks on women. New offences such as stalking and voyeurism were also incorporated. Convicted rapists were said to face a minimum sentence of 20 years to life and would only be sentenced with the death penalty if the victim were to die from the injuries caused or left in a vegetative state. However, this law too is not free from its setbacks. Although it reduces the age of consent from 18 to 16, it denoted that the rape of a “married” child between 15 and 18, similar to a married adult, would still be considered legal. Nilanjana Roy, a leading commentator and novelist, believes this is because many people within the Indian society do not regard marital rape as a crime. Karuna Nundy, member of the New York Bar and practitioner at Supreme Court of India, suggests that one of the reasons crimes towards women has catapulted is because the country has one of the lowest number of judges and police in proportion to its population. She also states, “Failures to convict rapists are due to institutionalized misogyny to some degree, but they’re also due to insufficient competence of police and prosecutors.”

Not too long ago, chief of Samajwadi Party, Mulayum Singh Yadav allegedly stated at an election rally in Moradabad district of northern Uttar Pradesh, “handing death sentence for rape is not fair… boys make mistakes… there will be changes in the law if we come to power.” Although, Mr. Yadav’s comment reeked of male chauvinism, the reality is that his thoughts are represented by a particular sector of society. Nevertheless, Mr. Yadav does not have the authority to make any assurances on changing the law. One of India’s leading newspapers, The Times of India wrote, “Even by his misogynistic standards, he seems to have sunk to a new low… The change in the laws was brought on after months of selfless demonstration by citizens striving to bring about a change in India’s social outlook by terming rape as ‘just another mistake boys make’, Mulayam has just rendered a slap in the face of their efforts.”

A vast majority of crimes on women have gone unreported, primarily because the attackers do not see their actions as a crime. The perpetrators operate on the hunch that the victim won’t report the abuse to the authorities because they would undergo an overwhelming sense of shame and guilt. The violence and sexual assault that occurs within the family is less reported, as members within the family believe that the victim’s pain should be sacrificed in the name of “collective honour.” Neeraj Kumar, a former commissioner of Delhi Police, revealed, “if you look at the data, in 97% of rape cases in India, the perpetrator is known to the victim. These are opportunistic crimes. The question of the police preventing these rapes does not arise. You cannot go into people’s bedrooms and houses.” Contrary to Karuna Nundy’s statement he adds, “Just putting more policemen on the roads will not help matters. Delhi has over 80,000 policemen but simply expanding the force will not necessarily help curb rape.”

The major expansion in India’s service sector paved a new era for women in the workforce. The economic overhauls of the early 1990s leveraged a 60 percent expansion in India’s gross domestic product causing millions of Indian women to be recruited. Girls were beginning to outshine boy in all fields. This breakthrough for women not only raised anxiety for most men, but also drastically increased levels of vulnerability for women. All throughout India, women began to feel susceptible to attack from a growing number of unattached and unemployed men who viewed women’s success as a reason for their failure. Philip Zimbardo, a well-known psychologist and writer of the novel “The Demise of Guys,” claims the reason boys are being outperformed by girls is because boys prefer the ‘asynchronistic internet world’ as opposed to the spontaneous interactions in social relationships. Zimbardo claims that excessive Internet use enticed with easy access to pornography are “arousal addictions” that enable boys brains to be digitally rewired for novelty and excitement causing them to be ‘totally out of sync in traditional classes and romantic relationship that build gradually and subtly.’ Surprisingly, the industry even supplies it. The demand for “item songs” and roles were women play the damsel in distress are significantly high in the Indian Cinema as that is what receives the most commercial gain. The Bollywood industry has just started breaking the mould by experimenting with stronger female characters.

The increase in rapes is not a condition produced by economic circumstances nor is it the poor that are more likely to commit such crimes; it is a mixture of factors. Even though India has been listed as the “worst country to be a woman,” lets face it, crimes against women are happening all over the globe. The incident in Steubenville, Ohio where high school football players were accused of repeatedly raping an unconscious 16-year-old girl after she was lugged from one party to another, prompted a comment in New York Times titled “Is Delhi So Different From Steubenville?” In the Democratic Republic of Congo, more than 400,000 women are raped each year while in Somalia female genital mutilation is relatively more widespread. Therefore, crimes towards women are not a country specific issue, rather it is a global issue that should be taken a lot more seriously by all institutions within the society. Stereotyping women, blaming the victim and trying to figure out if she was the one who invited the rape is not a solution. Calling gender violence a women’s issue gives men an excuse not to pay attention. Martin Luther King famously said, “In the end what will hurt the most is not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.” The Bystander Approach, devised by Jackson Katz, deals with exactly that – our relentless silence and the role of our peers. In this approach, staying silent is seen as a form of consent and complicity. This concept revolutionizes the purpose of a society by empowering members within it to create a peer culture where abusive behaviour is seen as not just illegal, but also unacceptable. Men and boys who act out in strident and sexist ways lose status amongst their peers and other members of society. This approach is supposed to be put in play at all times and not just when crimes against women reach its pinnacle.

Welcome to the age of ‘The Rise’

RiSe Mumbai!

Introducing Team Rise

The horrific crime that took place on 16th December sparked a firestorm of protests. The incident not only touched the lives of many, but also encouraged India’s restless and increasingly assertive youth to rise against the abuse occurring towards women within the country. School and college students have been organising and actively participating in educating their local communities on issues around discrimination and abuse towards women. Rise Mumbai was one such event that helped educate and awaken other members within society to the harsh realities of physical and sexual abuse that Indian women encounter. Led by a team of diligent students from Podar College of Commerce and Economics, the event took three and half months to execute. Their relentless effort and dedication towards organising an event fully dedicated to the security of women in India is what got me hell bent on writing this article. When asked what inspired them to rise against such issues they responded, “Like every other ordinary Mumbaikar we never gave too much thought to doing anything for society. But this changed one day when a female friend of ours felt insecure at night at a railway station even when she had two guys with her to drop her off. This incident made us think and UNLIKE any other ordinary Mumbaikar instead of waiting for something terrible to happen, we decided to be proactive and work for women’s safety in Mumbai.” Managing an event such as Rise brought its own set of challenges. The students’ drive to create a positive change in society was constantly tested; unfortunately, not everyone could set himself or herself to the task. However, the group of students that did manage to successfully juggle all their responsibilities made Rise a dream come true. The kind of educational tools and skills shared by team Rise was an effective way to provoke thought and strike a gripping discussion. With hosting a one-day event like Rise, the drawback is that most people tend to gradually forget about it all. Nonetheless, team Rise says they have it all planned out. They aspire to hold monthly workshops in schools as well as organize a city-wide campaign to educate individuals about physical and sexual abuse towards women, the downsides of corruption and so on. They say, “We realise change is not something that comes in a day or two. It may take a year or a thousand years. All we aimed to do is give a start, make people think. To show the world that the youth can be responsible and to tell the youth that it is ‘cool’ to be good.” But like with any event, financial backing is mandatory. All assistance/volunteers and sponsorship would be greatly appreciated.

 RISE is a campaign initiated to make Mumbai a better place for women. It aims at eliminating any gender-based violence against women, especially rape.

Video Powered by Team Interpret – www.lightscamerainterpret.com

Music and Sound Recording done at Seven Sounds Productions

Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcUyYXb2rTo

Mumbai Series: Over a Bottle of Breezer


 Note: This post in no way promotes or endorses alcoholism. Now, since I have got that out of the way, I can head on to the real deal.

People’s perception of the way life has to be lived has changed in ways inconceivable to the human mind. In just the last decade, media exposure along with the boom in technological progression has encouraged the ideological amalgamation of the East and the West. Insanely enough, most Indians, teenagers and young adults especially, don’t believe in religious superstitions anymore, which was a huge thing to rave about in the generations before. Rather, today’s generation wants to embrace the adventurous and mysterious life of the West – or the idea of it anyway. That’s ‘orientalism’ in action.

A night ago, I managed to get myself stuck in quite a predicament – a heated “creative discussion” that I refer to as ‘The Battle of the Generations.’ (Mind you this whole conversation was over a bottle of Breezer – a few actually.) During the whole conversation, it hit me hard that the issues faced by both the older as well as the younger generation in India were similarly different. As in the problems faced by each generation were valid and legitimate at that specific time.

The conversation always starts of with, “Aaj kal ke bache kuch bhi value nahi karte…” (The kids of this generation don’t value anything) and the criticism goes on. However, a lot has changed overtime. Like I said, change can be a hard pill to swallow.

It has become evident that individuals today spend their entire lives seeking some kind of validation outside themselves, which perhaps was not the case before. In our grandparents, or even parent’s generation, there was always someone or the other (most often mothers) that offered undivided attention to their child/children. They were like a shield that guided and protected their children from the tempestuous realities of the ‘big bad world’. Now, with both parents having secured a position in the public sphere, this generation finds those same temptations too enticing to deny. Hence, the emotional validation is much needed. Exposure to media and technology play their own role in this. For example: most girls wouldn’t consider themselves to be “beautiful” unless they received a compliment from someone else mentioning that they were or that they weren’t intelligent enough because they didn’t receive straight A’s in their report card.

The other day, I went out to nearby park with my baby cousin brother and his mother. To my surprise all the children at that park had come with their nannies and NOT their parents. There were some children that were being cared for and looked after by the nanny just like how a parent would, while other children were left to do whatever they wanted. It made me realise that acquiring the right type of attention from the parents is absolutely necessary. When a growing child’s expectations are not met they resort to alternate ways to procure that attention. Using social media to fill in the void is just one of the many methods. Interestingly enough, people using social media sites such as Facebook exploit this need for attention. How many likes do you have on your Facebook display picture? How many friends do you have on Facebook? How many people follow you on Twitter? If you can cross a certain number of likes or followers on Facebook/Twitter, you are automatically deemed “popular”.

A child that is starved of love, attention and nurturing often (not always) encounter someone online/offline who is capable of abusing that desire for positive attention. This causes the child to develop insecurities about himself/herself, leaving them emotionally scared and constantly craving for some kind of attention – be it positive or negative. This often initiates rebellious behaviours within a child that later continue for another reason altogether.

The way the world operates today, financially and socially, has completely whittled the equation between a child and his/her parents. Having both parents entering the public sphere is no longer an option; it is an imperative in order to secure the finances of the family along with the future of the child.  As a result, obedience and disobedience have an altered definition. Hence, its not that the ‘kids of today’s generation’ don’t know how to value, its just that they process and conduct things in a completely different way from their parents and grandparents.